![]() |
Timothy Dalton *must* play Bond in Bond 21
Yes, he *must*.
If the producers wants to come back to basic, and have Bond be "serious" like Connery and Dalton, then Dalton has to play Bond in Bond 21. If he played Bond in Bond 21, then he will start to shape Bond that we will scene for the netx few decades. After Dalton's 1 film stunt, James Bond #6 will grab the Bond that Dalton made, and shape it even more. Lets just hope that Bond #6 will have a 7 picture deal. Then, Bond #7 can continue the "serious Bond" era. If that happends, the serie will be saved, and we will live many many great years with new James Bond movies comming each 2-3 years. If that happends, other spy series won't stand a chance against Bond. I am PRAYING that the Producers reads this |
I agree, and if you look at it, Dalton's Bond looks similiar to Brosnan's Bond, even though they each had their own version of Bond, they looked similiar playing the part. Perhaps bringing back Daltonw oudl be the best movie sicne calling up Connery to do Dr. No
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Moore played the comedy just right. Brosnan doesn't even know how to act comedy right. That's why he looked as an idot in the role. Connery and Dalton are the BEST Bond: dark and serious. Dalton was juts the dark and serious enough. I am sure he can be even MORE dark and serious in Bond 21. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That way, Bond#6 can continue the dark era. |
What Brosnan was able to do was to take the interesting emotional territory Dalton had started exploring and fuse it with Moore's lighter style. Not always successfully, but there were scenes in Brosnan's films which seemed Daltonesque and those more suited to Roger Moore. I think Brosnan's best work in the role was when he had Dalton's darkness.
|
Quote:
Just as with Lazenby, I wish Dalton had been able to do at least one more...what could have been... |
Mav, Dalton should of made 2 more, since that was his contract.
His contract was 4 movies (1987,1989,1991 and 1993) What could of been... :( |
Myself I don't think Brosnan has much in the way of comedy. I put him right with Dalton in that one.
The first 3 Bonds seem leaps and leaps funnier in comparison to the last two when you watch the films. Of course the writing and the directing and way the producers go figures on that too. But Moore's "silly humor" was pulled off where Brosnan's isn't. Dalton didn't even have it. I would describe Pierce as a cross between Dalton and Moore minus the humor. He's always said to be like Connery or whatever or cross between Connery and Moore..... I hear people say Dalton is like Connery too.... To me though Connery is like Connery Moore is like Moore Lazenby is like Dalton and Connery Dalton is like Lazenby minus the humor and physicality Brosnan is like Dalton and Moore minus the humor Brosnan doesn't have the physicality to be like Connery and neither do Moore or Dalton |
Quote:
|
Pierce said before (as in before he was told not to say it) that Lazenby and his film were sad and pathetic and a disgrace and that he hates the film and Lazenby's acting and him and the film should have been removed from the Bond library ( a lot of people seem to agree).
After the press ran with this he has since called OHMSS great and Lazenby a good Bond. But how he really feels was from above as he said in an interview before GoldenEye. So if he does have any Lazenby influence it would be quite ironic. But I don't see it. To me Pierce is like a Dalton and Moore combined, but just not the part of Moore that had the humor. |
Quote:
And I suppose you haven't seen both YOLT and DAF, were his Bond begins to become comical and cartoony. And I won’t even talk about NSNA! He is the definitive Bond in my Book, but never dark or serious, just a cool and dangerous gentleman secret agent. Now Dalton, he was hard edge and Dark, a haunted soul, and his business was gritty and violent. Very cool, such a shame he didn't make a third, but now he is old, he still looks quite good , but he has lost his edge, he can't be menacing anymore, as I've seen in his last performances... You just can't be serious and think that EON would consider for a second getting a 007 actor that is older than Brosnan, and who wasn't very popular with the public to begin with! Quote:
|
I think Connery put in the right amount of humor:
Moore = just a little to funny Dalton = A little too serious, but I like that Connery = half and half fave Connery quote: Thunderball: Bond: ~Places Volpe in a chair after being shot~ "Do you mind if she sits this one out? She's just dead," :lol: |
I'm with the Dalton camp. Living Daylights is my favourite of the Bond films, and LTK doesn't deserve the critical panning it got on its release. Sure its no Thunderball or Goldfinger, but it and TLD show what Dalton was/is capable of. My only concern is that maybe TD is a little old now. How old is he, exactly? I've always seen JB as being midthirties, up to about mid forties. But otherwise he is just a caricature running and jumping about.
1991 and 1993 would have been good - now we can only dream, and wait for Casino Royale. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin; copyright © 2000 - 2005 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.